SLAVA CUP - 2010 TOP 32

Moscow City Golf Club, February 20 - 22, 2010

Results of round 8.

Table	NS		EW		IMPs		VPs		adj
Table	NS		EW		NS	EW	NS	EW	NS	EW
1	Sergey ERSHOV Gennady RYBNIKOV		Yury VINOGRADOV Anatoly PAVLOV		21	10	41	19
2	Ivan SEMENOV Vitold SLIVA		Igor RADYUKEVICH Oleg TIMOKHOVICH		19	1	48	12
3	Oleg OSAULENKO Michael ROZENBLUM		Sergey KOZLOV Alexander PETRUNIN		16	9	37	23
4	Alexey KONDRASHENKO Alexander RISKIN		Dmitry VOLKOV Sergey POROSHIN		0	34	0	60
5	Yury ANDREEV Pavel VOROBEY		Olga VOROBEYCHIKOVA Anna GULEVICH		12	15	27	33
6	Maxim SALMIN Gombo TSYDYNZHAPOV		Michael BAKAL Michael KRASNOSELSKY		14	15	29	31
7	Valentin KYCHANOV Sergey ORLOV		Maxim ZHMAK Oleg KAZANTSEV		23	7	44	12		-1
8	Vladimir REKUNOV Dmitry ROGOV		Alexandra NIKITINA Elena KHONICHEVA		11	15	26	34
9	Larisa PANINA Dmitry PROKHOROV		Alexey OTCHERTSOV Boris SAZONOV		16	10	36	24
10	Alexey KOSHELEV Konstantin PEREKHREST		Eugene NOTKIN Michael SHADRIN		4	16	18	42
11	Eugene RUDAKOV Maxim KVEN		Alexey BOGACH Michael LITMAN		17	8	39	21
12	Arkady BELINKOV Eugene MARCHENKO		Anatoly GUDKOV Alexander ISAEV		13	7	34	22
13	Igor ARTAMONOV Konstantin PERFILOV		Leonid BIZER Lev BRUNI		26	0	56	4
14	Svetlana CHUBAROVA Anatoly RADOKHLEB		Larisa KURSAKOVA Anastasia MITYAGINA		7	25	12	48
15	Natalia ZHENOVA Tatiana PEREKATOVA		Olga GALAKTIONOVA Sergey STOLBOVSKY		25	5	50	10
16	Maria LEBEDEVA Igor KHAZANOV		Pavel GOMEROV Andrey SHUDNEV		7	10	27	33

DLR: N		VUL: EW
	AQ652
	K32
	A63
	J5
743	57	10
A64		QJ
J94		Q108752
A1087		KQ32
	KJ98
	109875
	K
	964

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	8	9	9	4	5		E	5	3	4	8	8
S	8	9	9	4	5		W	5	3	4	8	8
minimax = 2 S, +140

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	4	N	Q	+1	450	7	-7
2	20	22	4	N	Q	=	420	6	-6
3	16	11	2	N	Q	+3	200	1	-1
4	26	24	2	N	7	+1	140	-1	1
5	4	7	3	N	K	-1	-50	-6	6
6	32	23	5	E	K	-2	200	1	-1
7	14	9	3	N	5	=	140	-1	1
8	13	3	4	N	Q	-1	-50	-6	6
9	6	10	5x	W	A	-1	200	1	-1
10	15	18	3	N	Q	+1	170	0	0
11	2	31	4	N	Q	=	420	6	-6
12	27	17	3	N	10	+1	170	0	0
13	30	28	3	N	2	+1	170	0	0
14	5	25	3	N	2	=	140	-1	1
15	29	19	3	N	Q	+3	230	2	-2
16	1	8	3	N	Q	+1	170	0	0

DLR: E		VUL: Both
	Q98
	--
	KQ832
	KJ842
753	58	KJ6
AK97532		104
7		AJ1094
103		Q95
	A1042
	QJ86
	65
	A76

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	7	8	5	8	9		E	6	5	8	5	4
S	7	7	5	8	9		W	6	5	8	5	4
minimax = 2 N, +110

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	3	W	Q	-2	200	9	-9
2	20	22	2	W	4	=	-110	2	-2
3	16	11	3	N	10	=	110	7	-7
4	26	24	4	N	10	-4	-400	-5	5
5	4	7	5	S	A	-3	-300	-3	3
6	32	23	5x	N	A	-3	-800	-12	12
7	14	9					A-/A-	-2	-2
8	13	3	4	N	10	-2	-200	0	0
9	6	10	5	N	A	-3	-300	-3	3
10	15	18	4	N	10	-1	-100	3	-3
11	2	31	5	N	10	-2	-200	0	0
12	27	17	5	S	A	-2	-200	0	0
13	30	28	4	N	10	-1	-100	3	-3
14	5	25	3	W	2	-1	100	7	-7
15	29	19	4	S	A	-2	-200	0	0
16	1	8	5	S	7	-3	-300	-3	3

DLR: S		VUL: None
	98754
	Q6543
	2
	98
A6	59	KJ32
AKJ		72
AQ7643		95
AQ		K7532
	Q10
	1098
	KJ108
	J1064

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	2	3	3	2	1		E	11	10	9	11	12
S	2	3	4	2	1		W	11	10	9	11	12
minimax = 6 E, -920

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	6NT	W	3	-1	50	5	-5
2	20	22	6	E	9	-1	50	5	-5
3	16	11	6NT	W	5	-4	200	8	-8
4	26	24	3NT	W	4	+1	-430	-7	7
5	4	7	6	W	8	-1	50	5	-5
6	32	23	6	W	2	-1	50	5	-5
7	14	9	6NT	W	8	-1	50	5	-5
8	13	3	3NT	E	9	+1	-430	-7	7
9	6	10	3NT	E	2	+1	-430	-7	7
10	15	18	3NT	W	2	+1	-430	-7	7
11	2	31	3NT	W	8	=	-400	-7	7
12	27	17	3NT	W	4	+1	-430	-7	7
13	30	28	3NT	E	10	-2	100	6	-6
14	5	25	3NT	W	2	=	-400	-7	7
15	29	19	6	W	4	-1	50	5	-5
16	1	8	6x	W	9	-1	100	6	-6

DLR: W		VUL: NS
	J73
	J10754
	KJ2
	A6
Q1065	60	K9842
KQ8		A
Q		A9873
J8754		Q9
	A
	9632
	10654
	K1032

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	5	2	9	6	5		E	8	10	4	6	8
S	5	2	9	6	5		W	8	10	4	6	8
minimax = 4 E, -420

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	4	E	A	+1	-450	0	0
2	20	22	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
3	16	11	4	E	5	+1	-450	0	0
4	26	24	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
5	4	7	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
6	32	23	4	E	2	=	-420	1	-1
7	14	9	4	E	3	=	-420	1	-1
8	13	3	4	E	3	+1	-450	0	0
9	6	10	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
10	15	18	4	E	2	=	-420	1	-1
11	2	31	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
12	27	17	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
13	30	28	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
14	5	25	4	E	2	+1	-450	0	0
15	29	19	2	E	6	+2	-170	7	-7
16	1	8	4	E	7	+1	-450	0	0

DLR: N		VUL: Both
	764
	Q42
	10874
	984
KQ102	61	853
KJ93		76
QJ6		A953
QJ		10653
	AJ9
	A1085
	K2
	AK72

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	6	6	7	6	7		E	6	7	6	7	6
S	7	6	7	6	7		W	6	7	6	7	6
minimax = 1NT S, +90

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	1NT x	W	8	=	-180	-3	3
2	20	22	2	N	5	-1	-100	-1	1
3	16	11	1NT x	W	2	=	-180	-3	3
4	26	24	1NT	S	K	-2	-200	-4	4
5	4	7	1NT x	W	8	-1	200	6	-6
6	32	23	2	S	K	+1	140	5	-5
7	14	9	1NT x	W	8	-1	200	6	-6
8	13	3	1NT	S	Q	-1	-100	-1	1
9	6	10	1NT	E	5	-1	100	4	-4
10	15	18	1NT x	W	6	=	-180	-3	3
11	2	31	1NT	S	K	+1	120	5	-5
12	27	17					A-/A-	-2	-2
13	30	28	1NT	S	K	=	90	4	-4
14	5	25	2x	S	2	-2	-500	-10	10
15	29	19	2NT	S	K	-2	-200	-4	4
16	1	8	1NT	S	K	-1	-100	-1	1

DLR: E		VUL: None
	Q83
	J52
	K43
	Q854
K	62	A942
10963		AQ84
AQ1097		J2
A32		K107
	J10765
	K7
	865
	J96

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	2	5	2	2	4		E	10	8	11	11	9
S	2	5	2	2	4		W	10	8	11	11	9
minimax = 4 W, -450

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	4	W	5	+1	-450	0	0
2	20	22	4	E	J	+1	-450	0	0
3	16	11	4	W	4	+1	-450	0	0
4	26	24	4	W	2	+1	-450	0	0
5	4	7	4	W	4	=	-420	1	-1
6	32	23	3NT	W	4	+1	-430	1	-1
7	14	9	6	W	2	-1	50	11	-11
8	13	3	4	W	2	+1	-450	0	0
9	6	10	4	E	2	+1	-450	0	0
10	15	18	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
11	2	31	4	W	3	+1	-450	0	0
12	27	17	4	W	4	=	-420	1	-1
13	30	28	4	W	3	+1	-450	0	0
14	5	25	4	W	2	+1	-450	0	0
15	29	19	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
16	1	8	4	E	6	=	-420	1	-1

DLR: S		VUL: NS
	765
	QJ53
	J3
	10984
A103	63	QJ842
K876		A9
AK1085		42
Q		A732
	K9
	1042
	Q976
	KJ65

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	1	1	3	1	5		E	10	12	10	12	8
S	1	1	3	1	5		W	10	12	10	12	8
minimax = 6 E, -980

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	4	E	5	+2	-480	-1	1
2	20	22	4	E	9	+1	-450	0	0
3	16	11	4	E	2	+1	-450	0	0
4	26	24	6	W	7	=	-980	-11	11
5	4	7	4	E	4	+1	-450	0	0
6	32	23	3NT	E	10	+1	-430	1	-1
7	14	9	4	E	6	+1	-450	0	0
8	13	3	4	E	5	+2	-480	-1	1
9	6	10	4	E	10	+1	-450	0	0
10	15	18	4	E	5	+2	-480	-1	1
11	2	31	4	W	J	+2	-480	-1	1
12	27	17	3NT	W	4	+2	-460	0	0
13	30	28	3NT	E	5	+1	-430	1	-1
14	5	25	4	E	2	+2	-480	-1	1
15	29	19	4	E	4	+2	-480	-1	1
16	1	8	4	E	5	+1	-450	0	0

DLR: W		VUL: EW
	1093
	A1076
	Q5
	A843
AJ8754	64	KQ2
Q4		953
K32		A86
Q9		K1075
	6
	KJ82
	J10974
	J62

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	5	3	7	7	5		E	8	10	5	5	7
S	5	3	7	7	6		W	8	10	5	5	7
minimax = 4 W, -620

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	21	4	W	3	=	-620	-6	6
2	20	22	3	W	2	+1	-170	6	-6
3	16	11	4	W	A	=	-620	-6	6
4	26	24	4	W	3	=	-620	-6	6
5	4	7	4	W	3	=	-620	-6	6
6	32	23	5x	S	A	-3	-500	-3	3
7	14	9	4	W	10	=	-620	-6	6
8	13	3	4	W	10	-1	100	11	-11
9	6	10	4	W	3	-1	100	11	-11
10	15	18	3NT	W	4	=	-600	-5	5
11	2	31	3	W	3	+1	-170	6	-6
12	27	17	4	E	J	-2	200	12	-12
13	30	28	4	W	Q	-2	200	12	-12
14	5	25	4	W	2	+1	-650	-6	6
15	29	19	4	W	Q	-1	100	11	-11
16	1	8	4	W	10	=	-620	-6	6

Scoring and results by Anton Osipov© 2010 for SLAVA CUP.