SLAVA CUP - 2010 TOP 32
Moscow City Golf Club, February 20 - 22, 2010
Ranking
Rounds:
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Results of round 3.
Table
NS
EW
IMPs
VPs
adj
NS
EW
NS
EW
NS
EW
1
Yury VINOGRADOV
Anatoly PAVLOV
Igor RADYUKEVICH
Oleg TIMOKHOVICH
12
23
19
41
2
Alexey KONDRASHENKO
Alexander RISKIN
Sergey ERSHOV
Gennady RYBNIKOV
8
31
7
53
3
Eugene NOTKIN
Michael SHADRIN
Olga GALAKTIONOVA
Sergey STOLBOVSKY
16
0
46
14
4
Igor ARTAMONOV
Konstantin PERFILOV
Ivan SEMENOV
Vitold SLIVA
1
37
0
60
5
Oleg OSAULENKO
Michael ROZENBLUM
Maxim ZHMAK
Oleg KAZANTSEV
15
16
29
31
6
Michael BAKAL
Michael KRASNOSELSKY
Sergey KOZLOV
Alexander PETRUNIN
11
17
24
36
7
Arkady BELINKOV
Eugene MARCHENKO
Vladimir REKUNOV
Dmitry ROGOV
19
2
47
13
-1
8
Dmitry VOLKOV
Sergey POROSHIN
Maria LEBEDEVA
Igor KHAZANOV
18
0
48
12
9
Pavel GOMEROV
Andrey SHUDNEV
Yury ANDREEV
Pavel VOROBEY
9
29
10
50
10
Alexey KOSHELEV
Konstantin PEREKHREST
Olga VOROBEYCHIKOVA
Anna GULEVICH
12
6
36
24
11
Alexey BOGACH
Michael LITMAN
Larisa PANINA
Dmitry PROKHOROV
12
11
31
29
12
Svetlana CHUBAROVA
Anatoly RADOKHLEB
Natalia ZHENOVA
Tatiana PEREKATOVA
8
9
29
31
13
Maxim SALMIN
Gombo TSYDYNZHAPOV
Anatoly GUDKOV
Alexander ISAEV
11
2
39
21
14
Alexandra NIKITINA
Elena KHONICHEVA
Larisa KURSAKOVA
Anastasia MITYAGINA
11
18
23
37
15
Leonid BIZER
Lev BRUNI
Valentin KYCHANOV
Sergey ORLOV
3
22
11
49
16
Alexey OTCHERTSOV
Boris SAZONOV
Eugene RUDAKOV
Maxim KVEN
5
21
14
46
DLR: N
VUL: None
J10
1082
86543
AK10
AKQ87
17
632
63
KQ954
QJ9
K10
J62
953
954
AJ7
A72
Q874
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
6
5
7
8
7
E
6
7
6
5
6
S
6
5
7
8
7
W
6
7
6
5
6
minimax = 2
N, +90
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
2
W
K
+1
-140 
-1
1
2
26
12
2
W
K
=
-110 
0
0
3
18
19
2
W
A
=
-110 
0
0
4
30
20
2
W
J
=
-110 
0
0
5
16
9
2
W
J
=
-110 
0
0
6
23
11
2
W
8
=
-110 
0
0
7
27
13
2
W
A
-1
      50
4
-4
8
24
1
2
W
K
-1
      50
4
-4
9
8
4
2
W
J
=
-110 
0
0
10
15
7
1NT x
S
A
-1
-100 
0
0
11
31
6
2
E
4
-1
      50
4
-4
12
5
29
2
W
2
=
-110 
0
0
13
32
17
1
W
K
+1
-110 
0
0
14
3
25
2
W
9
=
-110 
0
0
15
28
14
2
E
A
=
-110 
0
0
16
10
2
2
W
J
=
-110 
0
0
DLR: E
VUL: NS
Q752
6543
K
Q985
94
18
AKJ103
1098
AKQ7
Q975
J84
K764
A
86
J2
A10632
J1032
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
2
3
2
3
5
E
11
10
11
10
7
S
2
2
2
3
5
W
11
10
11
10
7
minimax = 3NT W, -460
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
3NT
W
5
+1
-430 
0
0
2
26
12
3NT
W
6
+2
-460 
-1
1
3
18
19
3NT
W
5
+1
-430 
0
0
4
30
20
6NT
W
5
=
-990 
-11
11
5
16
9
1
E
J
+3
-170 
6
-6
6
23
11
3NT
W
6
+1
-430 
0
0
7
27
13
4
E
8
+2
-480 
-2
2
8
24
1
3NT
W
K
+1
-430 
0
0
9
8
4
3NT
W
2
+1
-430 
0
0
10
15
7
3NT
W
5
+1
-430 
0
0
11
31
6
3NT
W
5
+2
-460 
-1
1
12
5
29
3NT
W
2
+1
-430 
0
0
13
32
17
3NT
W
9
+1
-430 
0
0
14
3
25
3
E
10
+1
-170 
6
-6
15
28
14
4NT
W
5
+2
-490 
-2
2
16
10
2
3NT
W
8
+1
-430 
0
0
DLR: S
VUL: EW
J942
87542
1076
6
Q10
19
863
Q106
AJ
AKJ32
Q95
KJ3
Q10542
AK75
K93
84
A987
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
5
8
8
3
4
E
7
4
4
7
9
S
5
8
8
3
4
W
7
4
4
7
9
minimax = 3
* N, -100
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
3NT
E
5
=
-600 
-11
11
2
26
12
3NT
W
7
-1
    100
3
-3
3
18
19
3NT
W
2
-2
    200
5
-5
4
30
20
3NT
W
6
+2
-660 
-12
12
5
16
9
3NT
W
7
=
-600 
-11
11
6
23
11
3NT
W
A
-1
    100
3
-3
7
27
13
3NT
W
7
-2
    200
5
-5
8
24
1
3NT
W
2
-1
    100
3
-3
9
8
4
3NT
W
2
-2
    200
5
-5
10
15
7
3NT
W
2
-2
    200
5
-5
11
31
6
1NT
W
7
+4
-210 
-5
5
12
5
29
3NT
W
2
-1
    100
3
-3
13
32
17
3NT
W
2
-2
    200
5
-5
14
3
25
3NT
E
2
=
-600 
-11
11
15
28
14
3NT
W
7
-1
    100
3
-3
16
10
2
3NT
W
7
=
-600 
-11
11
DLR: W
VUL: Both
KQ3
AK10
J82
AJ53
92
20
J7
6543
Q9872
A65
1097
10762
Q84
A108654
J
KQ43
K9
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
12
12
9
12
11
E
1
1
4
1
2
S
12
12
8
12
11
W
1
1
4
1
2
minimax = 6NT S, +1440
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
6
S
5
=
  1430
0
0
2
26
12
4
S
5
+2
    680
-13
13
3
18
19
6
S
A
=
  1430
0
0
4
30
20
6
S
A
=
  1430
0
0
5
16
9
6
S
A
=
  1430
0
0
6
23
11
6
N
A
=
  1430
0
0
7
27
13
6
S
6
=
  1430
0
0
8
24
1
6
S
A
=
  1430
0
0
9
8
4
4
N
7
+2
    680
-13
13
10
15
7
6
N
9
=
  1430
0
0
11
31
6
6
S
A
=
  1430
0
0
12
5
29
6
S
2
=
  1430
0
0
13
32
17
6
N
10
=
  1430
0
0
14
3
25
6
S
2
=
  1430
0
0
15
28
14
6
S
5
=
  1430
0
0
16
10
2
6
S
2
=
  1430
0
0
DLR: N
VUL: NS
963
KQ
QJ3
98765
KQ8
21
AJ4
1063
A8754
108
A7654
J10432
--
10752
J92
K92
AKQ
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
7
6
3
4
6
E
6
6
10
8
7
S
7
6
3
4
6
W
6
6
10
8
7
minimax = 4
E, -420
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
3
E
K
=
-140 
1
-1
2
26
12
4
E
A
=
-420 
-6
6
3
18
19
3
E
A
=
-140 
1
-1
4
30
20
3
E
A
=
-140 
1
-1
5
16
9
3
E
A
=
-140 
1
-1
6
23
11
2
E
2
+2
-170 
0
0
7
27
13
2
E
A
+1
-140 
1
-1
8
24
1
2
E
A
+1
-140 
1
-1
9
8
4
2
E
Q
+1
-140 
1
-1
10
15
7
3
E
A
+1
-170 
0
0
11
31
6
2
E
A
+1
-140 
1
-1
12
5
29
3
E
2
+1
-170 
0
0
13
32
17
3
E
K
+1
-170 
0
0
14
3
25
2
E
2
+2
-170 
0
0
15
28
14
3
E
A
+1
-170 
0
0
16
10
2
4
E
A
=
-420 
-6
6
DLR: E
VUL: EW
1072
KJ7652
KJ
52
QJ85
22
A643
A104
983
6542
83
J6
KQ98
K9
Q
AQ1097
A10743
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
8
6
9
8
8
E
4
6
3
4
5
S
8
6
9
8
8
W
4
6
3
4
5
minimax = 1
N, +140
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
4
N
9
+1
    450
8
-8
2
26
12
2
N
8
+2
    170
2
-2
3
18
19
2
N
8
+3
    200
2
-2
4
30
20
2NT
S
Q
=
    120
0
0
5
16
9
3
S
6
-1
-50 
-5
5
6
23
11
4
N
3
+2
    480
8
-8
7
27
13
2
N
K
+1
    140
1
-1
8
24
1
2
N
3
+3
    200
2
-2
9
8
4
4
N
K
-1
-50 
-5
5
10
15
7
2
N
3
+3
    200
2
-2
11
31
6
4
S
Q
-1
-50 
-5
5
12
5
29
3NT
S
2
-1
-50 
-5
5
13
32
17
2
N
4
+1
    140
1
-1
14
3
25
3
S
Q
+1
    130
0
0
15
28
14
3
N
3
-1
-50 
-5
5
16
10
2
3
S
2
=
    110
0
0
DLR: S
VUL: Both
107
QJ942
Q98
AJ8
QJ532
23
AK86
5
73
K32
J764
9754
Q62
94
AK1086
A105
K103
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
8
6
10
7
7
E
4
7
3
6
5
S
8
6
10
7
7
W
4
7
3
6
5
minimax = 4
N, +620
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
4
S
Q
-1
-100 
-11
11
2
26
12
4
S
Q
-1
-100 
-11
11
3
18
19
4
S
Q
=
    620
5
-5
4
30
20
4
S
Q
-1
-100 
-11
11
5
16
9
4
S
Q
=
    620
5
-5
6
23
11
4
S
A
-1
-100 
-11
11
7
27
13
4
S
Q
=
    620
5
-5
8
24
1
4
S
7
=
    620
5
-5
9
8
4
4
S
Q
-1
-100 
-11
11
10
15
7
4
S
Q
=
    620
5
-5
11
31
6
4
S
6
=
    620
5
-5
12
5
29
4
S
2
=
    620
5
-5
13
32
17
4
S
Q
=
    620
5
-5
14
3
25
4
S
9
=
    620
5
-5
15
28
14
4
S
2
-1
-100 
-11
11
16
10
2
4
S
Q
=
    620
5
-5
DLR: W
VUL: None
A1074
AK9
3
J10852
Q653
24
J8
104
752
AKQ652
J10984
A
K96
K92
QJ863
7
Q743
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
5
8
9
3
10
E
6
5
3
9
3
S
5
8
9
3
10
W
6
5
3
9
3
minimax = 4
* W, +100
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
21
22
5
x
W
A
-2
    300
3
-3
2
26
12
5
x
W
A
-2
    300
3
-3
3
18
19
5
x
W
A
-2
    300
3
-3
4
30
20
5
W
A
-2
    100
-3
3
5
16
9
5
x
W
A
-2
    300
3
-3
6
23
11
4
S
A
-1
-50 
-6
6
7
27
13
5
x
W
A
-2
    300
3
-3
8
24
1
5
x
W
A
-2
    300
3
-3
9
8
4
5
x
W
K
-2
    300
3
-3
10
15
7
4
S
A
-1
-50 
-6
6
11
31
6
4
E
3
-5
    250
2
-2
12
5
29
4
W
2
-1
      50
-4
4
13
32
17
3
S
K
=
    140
-2
2
14
3
25
1NT
W
10
+1
-120 
-7
7
15
28
14
4
W
A
-1
      50
-4
4
16
10
2
4
W
A
-1
      50
-4
4
Scoring and results by Anton Osipov© 2010 for SLAVA CUP.