SLAVA CUP - 2010 TOP 32
Moscow City Golf Club, February 20 - 22, 2010
Ranking
Rounds:
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Results of round 10.
Table
NS
EW
IMPs
VPs
adj
NS
EW
NS
EW
NS
EW
1
Sergey ERSHOV
Gennady RYBNIKOV
Igor ARTAMONOV
Konstantin PERFILOV
15
4
41
19
2
Ivan SEMENOV
Vitold SLIVA
Dmitry VOLKOV
Sergey POROSHIN
0
39
0
60
3
Igor RADYUKEVICH
Oleg TIMOKHOVICH
Alexey KONDRASHENKO
Alexander RISKIN
17
16
31
29
4
Oleg OSAULENKO
Michael ROZENBLUM
Valentin KYCHANOV
Sergey ORLOV
6
35
1
59
5
Olga VOROBEYCHIKOVA
Anna GULEVICH
Yury VINOGRADOV
Anatoly PAVLOV
11
11
30
30
6
Alexandra NIKITINA
Elena KHONICHEVA
Sergey KOZLOV
Alexander PETRUNIN
20
24
26
34
7
Vladimir REKUNOV
Dmitry ROGOV
Alexey OTCHERTSOV
Boris SAZONOV
8
8
30
30
8
Yury ANDREEV
Pavel VOROBEY
Eugene NOTKIN
Michael SHADRIN
20
10
40
20
9
Maxim SALMIN
Gombo TSYDYNZHAPOV
Maxim ZHMAK
Oleg KAZANTSEV
21
8
45
19
10
Alexey KOSHELEV
Konstantin PEREKHREST
Eugene RUDAKOV
Maxim KVEN
7
15
24
40
11
Michael BAKAL
Michael KRASNOSELSKY
Alexey BOGACH
Michael LITMAN
25
8
47
13
-2
-2
12
Larisa PANINA
Dmitry PROKHOROV
Anatoly GUDKOV
Alexander ISAEV
8
12
28
36
13
Arkady BELINKOV
Eugene MARCHENKO
Pavel GOMEROV
Andrey SHUDNEV
15
8
35
21
14
Svetlana CHUBAROVA
Anatoly RADOKHLEB
Leonid BIZER
Lev BRUNI
16
12
34
26
15
Natalia ZHENOVA
Tatiana PEREKATOVA
Larisa KURSAKOVA
Anastasia MITYAGINA
16
11
35
25
-1
-1
16
Maria LEBEDEVA
Igor KHAZANOV
Olga GALAKTIONOVA
Sergey STOLBOVSKY
16
10
36
24
DLR: N
VUL: EW
972
Q85
J42
A765
106
73
KQ854
AK1073
4
A8653
KQ107
K
1083
AJ3
J962
9
QJ942
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
6
4
5
2
7
E
7
9
8
11
4
S
6
4
5
2
7
W
7
9
8
11
4
minimax = 5
W, -600
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
3
S
A
-1
-50 
8
-8
2
20
24
5
W
A
=
-600 
-6
6
3
22
26
6
E
Q
-1
    100
10
-10
4
16
14
5
E
Q
=
-600 
-6
6
5
7
21
4
E
Q
=
-620 
-6
6
6
3
11
5
W
A
-1
    100
10
-10
7
13
10
3
W
7
+2
-150 
6
-6
8
4
18
3
W
A
+2
-150 
6
-6
9
32
9
2
E
9
=
-110 
6
-6
10
15
2
5
W
A
=
-600 
-6
6
11
23
31
5
W
A
=
-600 
-6
6
12
6
17
5
W
2
=
-600 
-6
6
13
27
8
5
W
A
=
-600 
-6
6
14
5
28
3NT
W
2
-1
    100
10
-10
15
29
25
3
W
7
+1
-130 
6
-6
16
1
19
5
W
A
=
-600 
-6
6
DLR: E
VUL: Both
J103
A6
A872
K732
AK6
74
75
KQ1075
843
96
103
1085
AQJ964
Q9842
J92
KQJ54
--
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
5
9
5
10
3
E
7
4
8
3
10
S
5
9
5
10
3
W
7
4
8
3
10
minimax = 4
S, +130
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
3
S
K
+1
    130
4
-4
2
20
24
4
S
K
-1
-100 
-3
3
3
22
26
3
E
K
+1
-130 
-3
3
4
16
14
4
S
A
-1
-100 
-3
3
5
7
21
4
S
A
-1
-100 
-3
3
6
3
11
3
S
K
+1
    130
4
-4
7
13
10
4
S
K
-1
-100 
-3
3
8
4
18
4
S
A
-1
-100 
-3
3
9
32
9
4
E
K
=
-130 
-3
3
10
15
2
3
W
J
=
-140 
-4
4
11
23
31
4
S
A
=
    620
12
-12
12
6
17
3
S
2
+1
    130
4
-4
13
27
8
3
N
K
=
    140
4
-4
14
5
28
4
S
2
-1
-100 
-3
3
15
29
25
3
S
K
+1
    170
5
-5
16
1
19
4
W
J
-2
    200
5
-5
DLR: S
VUL: None
AK854
Q9
KQ
K1084
Q93
75
J102
853
K62
A965
J1072
AQ9
762
76
AJ1074
843
J53
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
9
10
10
9
11
E
2
3
2
4
2
S
9
10
10
9
11
W
3
3
2
4
2
minimax = 4
S, +420
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
1
N
6
+3
    170
-1
1
2
20
24
3
S
5
+2
    200
0
0
3
22
26
4
S
A
=
    420
5
-5
4
16
14
3NT
N
2
=
    400
5
-5
5
7
21
4
N
J
=
    420
5
-5
6
3
11
2
S
2
+3
    200
0
0
7
13
10
3
W
A
-4
    200
0
0
8
4
18
1
N
6
+2
    140
-2
2
9
32
9
1
N
J
+1
    110
-3
3
10
15
2
1
N
J
+3
    170
-1
1
11
23
31
2
N
A
+2
    170
-1
1
12
6
17
1
N
2
+3
    170
-1
1
13
27
8
3NT x
S
3
=
    550
8
-8
14
5
28
1
N
2
+3
    170
-1
1
15
29
25
1
N
2
+2
    140
-2
2
16
1
19
3NT
S
2
=
    400
5
-5
DLR: W
VUL: NS
Q64
9752
J82
1095
A10985
76
J32
QJ104
A863
74
109
KQ
AJ84
K7
K
AKQ653
7632
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
4
2
3
8
4
E
7
9
10
5
9
S
4
2
3
8
4
W
7
9
10
5
9
minimax = 4
E, -420
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
3
W
2
+1
-170 
-3
3
2
20
24
3
W
2
=
-140 
-2
2
3
22
26
3
W
8
=
-140 
-2
2
4
16
14
3
W
J
=
-140 
-2
2
5
7
21
2
W
2
+1
-140 
-2
2
6
3
11
3
S
Q
=
    110
5
-5
7
13
10
3
N
6
-1
-100 
-1
1
8
4
18
4
W
8
-1
      50
3
-3
9
32
9
4
E
8
-1
      50
3
-3
10
15
2
4
W
2
-1
      50
3
-3
11
23
31
3
W
A
-2
    100
4
-4
12
6
17
3
E
9
=
-140 
-2
2
13
27
8
3
W
2
=
-140 
-2
2
14
5
28
3
W
2
+1
-170 
-3
3
15
29
25
4
E
2
-2
    100
4
-4
16
1
19
4
E
A
-2
    100
4
-4
DLR: N
VUL: Both
K7632
6
Q8753
109
QJ54
77
A
AK7
Q10532
J92
A64
J73
K854
1098
J984
K10
AQ62
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
4
8
4
7
4
E
9
5
9
6
9
S
4
8
4
7
4
W
9
5
8
6
9
minimax = 4
* N, -500
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
4
E
9
-1
    100
1
-1
2
20
24
2NT
E
2
=
-120 
-5
5
3
22
26
4
E
9
-1
    100
1
-1
4
16
14
4
E
8
=
-620 
-12
12
5
7
21
4
E
K
-2
    200
4
-4
6
3
11
4
E
10
=
-620 
-12
12
7
13
10
4
E
9
-1
    100
1
-1
8
4
18
2
E
9
+1
-140 
-5
5
9
32
9
A+/A+
2
2
10
15
2
A+/A+
2
2
11
23
31
3NT
W
6
-4
    400
8
-8
12
6
17
A+/A+
2
2
13
27
8
4
E
9
-1
    100
1
-1
14
5
28
4
E
2
-2
    200
4
-4
15
29
25
4
E
9
-1
    100
1
-1
16
1
19
3NT
E
9
-1
    100
1
-1
DLR: E
VUL: None
Q87
A9743
64
1064
A10942
78
J6
KQ106
52
QJ2
10873
K
Q9873
K53
J8
AK95
AJ52
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
7
7
8
7
8
E
5
6
5
6
5
S
7
7
8
7
8
W
5
6
5
6
5
minimax = 2
N, +110
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
2
W
4
-3
    150
1
-1
2
20
24
2
W
6
-2
    100
-1
1
3
22
26
2
S
Q
+1
    140
0
0
4
16
14
2
W
5
-3
    150
1
-1
5
7
21
2
W
4
-3
    150
1
-1
6
3
11
2
E
J
-2
    100
-1
1
7
13
10
2
W
6
-3
    150
1
-1
8
4
18
2
x
W
4
-3
    500
9
-9
9
32
9
2
x
E
3
-3
    500
9
-9
10
15
2
2
W
6
-1
      50
-2
2
11
23
31
2
W
A
-2
    100
-1
1
12
6
17
2
E
6
-2
    100
-1
1
13
27
8
2
W
6
-3
    150
1
-1
14
5
28
2
N
2
-1
-50 
-5
5
15
29
25
2
N
J
-1
-50 
-5
5
16
1
19
2
W
6
-3
    150
1
-1
DLR: S
VUL: NS
AKQ1094
K4
3
A1097
85
79
63
J1075
A8
1052
KQJ9864
8632
K4
J72
Q9632
A7
QJ5
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
9
11
9
5
10
E
3
2
4
8
3
S
9
11
9
5
10
W
3
2
4
8
3
minimax = 5
N, +650
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
2
20
24
6
N
K
-1
-100 
-12
12
3
22
26
5
N
K
=
    650
1
-1
4
16
14
6
N
K
-1
-100 
-12
12
5
7
21
4
N
A
+1
    650
1
-1
6
3
11
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
7
13
10
5
x
E
J
-3
    500
-4
4
8
4
18
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
9
32
9
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
10
15
2
5
N
2
=
    650
1
-1
11
23
31
4
N
A
+1
    650
1
-1
12
6
17
5
N
K
=
    650
1
-1
13
27
8
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
14
5
28
5
N
2
=
    650
1
-1
15
29
25
5
x
E
2
-3
    500
-4
4
16
1
19
5
x
E
7
-3
    500
-4
4
DLR: W
VUL: EW
AQ10872
Q962
6
A5
K5
80
64
10753
J84
853
KJ1074
10842
K73
J93
AK
AQ92
QJ96
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
12
13
12
10
12
E
0
0
1
3
1
S
12
13
12
10
12
W
0
0
1
3
1
minimax = 7
N, +1510
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
12
30
6
N
K
=
    980
0
0
2
20
24
4
N
2
+3
    510
-10
10
3
22
26
4
N
10
+2
    480
-11
11
4
16
14
6
N
10
=
    980
0
0
5
7
21
6
N
J
=
    980
0
0
6
3
11
4
N
6
+2
    480
-11
11
7
13
10
6
N
J
=
    980
0
0
8
4
18
6
N
10
+1
  1010
1
-1
9
32
9
6
N
10
=
    980
0
0
10
15
2
6
N
J
+1
  1010
1
-1
11
23
31
6
N
A
=
    980
0
0
12
6
17
6
N
2
+1
  1010
1
-1
13
27
8
A-/A-
-2
-2
14
5
28
6
N
2
+1
  1010
1
-1
15
29
25
6
N
J
=
    980
0
0
16
1
19
6
N
3
=
    980
0
0
Scoring and results by Anton Osipov© 2010 for SLAVA CUP.