SLAVA CUP - 2010 TOP 32
Moscow City Golf Club, February 20 - 22, 2010
Ranking
Rounds:
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Results of round 15.
Table
NS
EW
IMPs
VPs
adj
NS
EW
NS
EW
NS
EW
1
Dmitry VOLKOV
Sergey POROSHIN
Valentin KYCHANOV
Sergey ORLOV
20
5
45
15
2
Sergey ERSHOV
Gennady RYBNIKOV
Ivan SEMENOV
Vitold SLIVA
11
13
28
32
3
Yury ANDREEV
Pavel VOROBEY
Igor RADYUKEVICH
Oleg TIMOKHOVICH
14
8
36
24
4
Olga VOROBEYCHIKOVA
Anna GULEVICH
Eugene RUDAKOV
Maxim KVEN
20
7
43
17
5
Eugene NOTKIN
Michael SHADRIN
Alexandra NIKITINA
Elena KHONICHEVA
3
20
13
47
6
Oleg OSAULENKO
Michael ROZENBLUM
Alexey KONDRASHENKO
Alexander RISKIN
26
15
41
19
7
Igor ARTAMONOV
Konstantin PERFILOV
Maxim ZHMAK
Oleg KAZANTSEV
12
12
30
30
8
Arkady BELINKOV
Eugene MARCHENKO
Larisa PANINA
Dmitry PROKHOROV
30
1
59
1
9
Natalia ZHENOVA
Tatiana PEREKATOVA
Vladimir REKUNOV
Dmitry ROGOV
6
28
8
52
10
Alexey KOSHELEV
Konstantin PEREKHREST
Alexey OTCHERTSOV
Boris SAZONOV
23
13
40
20
11
Sergey KOZLOV
Alexander PETRUNIN
Maxim SALMIN
Gombo TSYDYNZHAPOV
12
22
20
40
12
Michael BAKAL
Michael KRASNOSELSKY
Anatoly GUDKOV
Alexander ISAEV
9
19
20
40
13
Svetlana CHUBAROVA
Anatoly RADOKHLEB
Pavel GOMEROV
Andrey SHUDNEV
17
17
30
30
14
Leonid BIZER
Lev BRUNI
Maria LEBEDEVA
Igor KHAZANOV
13
15
28
32
15
Alexey BOGACH
Michael LITMAN
Larisa KURSAKOVA
Anastasia MITYAGINA
2
31
1
59
16
Olga GALAKTIONOVA
Sergey STOLBOVSKY
Yury VINOGRADOV
Anatoly PAVLOV
16
0
46
0
DLR: N
VUL: None
KQJ32
QJ
106
J932
1054
113
A8
1087543
96
J4
AKQ83
Q5
AK104
976
AK2
9752
876
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
3
6
3
3
3
E
10
7
10
10
10
S
3
6
3
3
3
W
10
7
10
10
10
minimax = 3NT W, -430
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
4
E
7
-1
      50
4
-4
2
12
20
2
E
A
+2
-170 
-2
2
3
4
22
4
W
K
-1
      50
4
-4
4
7
2
3
E
7
=
-140 
-1
1
5
18
3
2
E
A
+3
-200 
-3
3
6
16
26
4
x
W
10
-1
    100
5
-5
7
30
9
A-/A+
-2
2
8
27
6
2
E
7
+1
-140 
-1
1
9
29
13
3
W
K
=
-110 
0
0
10
15
10
4
E
7
-1
      50
4
-4
11
11
32
3NT
E
A
+1
-430 
-8
8
12
23
17
3
E
A
+1
-130 
-1
1
13
5
8
3NT
E
A
+1
-430 
-8
8
14
28
1
4
W
K
-1
      50
4
-4
15
31
25
4
x
N
A
-4
-800 
-12
12
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: E
VUL: NS
42
K832
KQJ5
K98
J83
114
KQ1096
J975
A4
742
93
532
AQ107
A75
Q106
A1086
J64
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
6
5
8
9
5
E
6
8
5
4
7
S
6
5
8
9
5
W
6
8
5
4
7
minimax = 3
* E, +100
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
3
E
6
-2
    100
4
-4
2
12
20
1NT
S
3
=
      90
4
-4
3
4
22
2
E
2
=
-110 
-2
2
4
7
2
3
S
2
-1
-100 
-1
1
5
18
3
3
S
2
-1
-100 
-1
1
6
16
26
2NT
S
J
-3
-300 
-6
6
7
30
9
A-/A+
-2
2
8
27
6
3
N
K
=
    110
5
-5
9
29
13
2
E
5
=
-110 
-2
2
10
15
10
2
E
6
+1
-140 
-2
2
11
11
32
3
S
3
=
    110
5
-5
12
23
17
3
E
A
=
-140 
-2
2
13
5
8
3NT
S
3
-1
-100 
-1
1
14
28
1
2
W
2
-1
      50
3
-3
15
31
25
1
E
3
+1
-110 
-2
2
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: S
VUL: EW
KQ542
K62
K6
J108
109
115
A63
AQJ5
10983
Q7
J8532
A9743
Q
J87
74
A1094
K652
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
8
8
4
6
8
E
5
4
8
7
5
S
8
8
5
6
8
W
5
4
8
7
5
minimax = 2NT S, +120
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
3
W
K
=
-140 
-5
5
2
12
20
2
N
3
=
    110
1
-1
3
4
22
3
N
Q
-1
-50 
-3
3
4
7
2
3
N
Q
=
    140
2
-2
5
18
3
3
N
Q
-1
-50 
-3
3
6
16
26
3
x
E
6
-2
    500
10
-10
7
30
9
A-/A+
-2
2
8
27
6
4
W
K
-2
    200
4
-4
9
29
13
3
N
Q
-1
-50 
-3
3
10
15
10
3
W
K
-2
    200
4
-4
11
11
32
3
W
2
-2
    200
4
-4
12
23
17
3
N
A
-1
-50 
-3
3
13
5
8
3
N
Q
-1
-50 
-3
3
14
28
1
2
W
J
-1
    100
1
-1
15
31
25
2
N
Q
+1
    140
2
-2
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: W
VUL: Both
AJ8532
Q54
3
A43
KQ107
116
9
106
A972
KJ985
AQ1062
KJ
Q52
64
KJ83
74
109876
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
4
6
5
2
7
E
8
6
7
10
5
S
4
6
5
2
7
W
8
6
7
10
5
minimax = 1
E, -130
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
3NT
W
2
+1
-630 
0
0
2
12
20
3NT
W
5
+1
-630 
0
0
3
4
22
3NT
W
2
=
-600 
1
-1
4
7
2
3NT
W
5
+1
-630 
0
0
5
18
3
3NT
W
2
=
-600 
1
-1
6
16
26
5
W
A
=
-600 
1
-1
7
30
9
A-/A+
-2
2
8
27
6
5
W
A
=
-600 
1
-1
9
29
13
3NT
W
5
+2
-660 
-1
1
10
15
10
3NT
W
2
=
-600 
1
-1
11
11
32
3NT
W
3
+1
-630 
0
0
12
23
17
3NT
W
A
+1
-630 
0
0
13
5
8
3NT
W
5
=
-600 
1
-1
14
28
1
3NT
W
3
+2
-660 
-1
1
15
31
25
3NT
E
5
+1
-630 
0
0
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: N
VUL: NS
KQJ3
J3
Q105
AK52
A2
117
9764
AK8762
95
J86
K973
109
764
1085
Q104
A42
QJ83
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
7
8
6
6
9
E
4
5
7
6
4
S
7
8
6
6
9
W
4
5
7
6
4
minimax = 2
N, +110
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
3NT
N
7
=
    600
9
-9
2
12
20
3NT
N
9
-2
-200 
-9
9
3
4
22
3NT
N
7
=
    600
9
-9
4
7
2
3NT
N
7
+1
    630
9
-9
5
18
3
3
x
W
K
-2
    300
2
-2
6
16
26
3NT
N
9
-2
-200 
-9
9
7
30
9
3NT
N
2
=
    600
9
-9
8
27
6
3NT
N
7
+1
    630
9
-9
9
29
13
3NT x
N
9
-2
-500 
-12
12
10
15
10
3NT
N
7
=
    600
9
-9
11
11
32
3NT
N
2
-2
-200 
-9
9
12
23
17
2NT
N
Q
-1
-100 
-8
8
13
5
8
3NT
N
7
=
    600
9
-9
14
28
1
5
N
7
-3
-300 
-11
11
15
31
25
3NT
N
9
-2
-200 
-9
9
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: E
VUL: EW
10965
Q843
Q4
A87
8
118
AK72
J9
K1076
9876
K1032
KQ6432
5
QJ43
A52
AJ5
J109
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
8
8
7
4
6
E
5
5
6
8
7
S
7
8
7
4
6
W
5
5
6
8
7
minimax = 2NT N, +120
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
4
W
J
-1
    100
3
-3
2
12
20
2
S
8
-1
-50 
-2
2
3
4
22
3
E
J
=
-110 
-3
3
4
7
2
3
E
Q
-1
    100
3
-3
5
18
3
3
S
Q
-1
-50 
-2
2
6
16
26
3
E
J
-1
    100
3
-3
7
30
9
2
N
5
=
    110
3
-3
8
27
6
4
E
A
-1
    100
3
-3
9
29
13
2
N
A
-4
-200 
-5
5
10
15
10
3
x
N
A
-3
-500 
-11
11
11
11
32
2
N
2
=
    110
3
-3
12
23
17
3
S
Q
-2
-100 
-3
3
13
5
8
5
E
A
-3
    300
7
-7
14
28
1
3
N
A
-2
-100 
-3
3
15
31
25
3NT
N
3
-2
-100 
-3
3
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: S
VUL: Both
964
K743
A974
J5
A10852
119
KQ7
J5
Q106
3
Q1065
109863
AK4
J3
A982
KJ82
Q72
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
6
4
8
8
4
E
7
9
5
5
9
S
6
4
8
8
4
W
7
9
5
5
9
minimax = 2
W, -140
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
2
12
20
2
N
A
=
    110
6
-6
3
4
22
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
4
7
2
4
W
5
-1
    100
6
-6
5
18
3
3NT
E
2
+1
-630 
-10
10
6
16
26
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
7
30
9
A-/A+
-2
2
8
27
6
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
9
29
13
2
N
A
=
    110
6
-6
10
15
10
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
11
11
32
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
12
23
17
4
S
A
-2
-200 
-2
2
13
5
8
2
E
2
+1
-140 
0
0
14
28
1
2
E
3
+1
-140 
0
0
15
31
25
2
W
J
+1
-140 
0
0
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
DLR: W
VUL: None
J94
K972
743
QJ3
Q7532
120
AK6
Q1084
63
1085
J62
8
K9764
108
AJ5
AKQ9
A1052
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
8
7
9
9
9
E
4
6
4
3
4
S
8
7
9
9
9
W
4
6
4
3
4
minimax = 2
N, +140
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
14
2NT
S
3
=
    120
0
0
2
12
20
1NT
S
3
+1
    120
0
0
3
4
22
1NT
S
3
+1
    120
0
0
4
7
2
3NT
S
3
-1
-50 
-5
5
5
18
3
1NT
S
2
=
      90
-1
1
6
16
26
3NT
S
8
=
    400
7
-7
7
30
9
A-/A+
-2
2
8
27
6
3NT
S
4
+2
    460
8
-8
9
29
13
3NT
S
3
-1
-50 
-5
5
10
15
10
3
x
E
A
-2
    300
5
-5
11
11
32
4
S
8
-1
-50 
-5
5
12
23
17
3
x
E
3
-3
    500
9
-9
13
5
8
3NT
N
A
-1
-50 
-5
5
14
28
1
2
x
W
Q
-2
    300
5
-5
15
31
25
3NT
S
3
-1
-50 
-5
5
16
19
21
A+/A-
2
-5
Scoring and results by Anton Osipov© 2010 for SLAVA CUP.