SLAVA CUP - 2010 TOP 32
Moscow City Golf Club, February 20 - 22, 2010
Ranking
Rounds:
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Results of round 14.
Table
NS
EW
IMPs
VPs
adj
NS
EW
NS
EW
NS
EW
1
Dmitry VOLKOV
Sergey POROSHIN
Sergey ERSHOV
Gennady RYBNIKOV
9
2
37
23
2
Valentin KYCHANOV
Sergey ORLOV
Ivan SEMENOV
Vitold SLIVA
21
7
44
16
3
Yury ANDREEV
Pavel VOROBEY
Igor RADYUKEVICH
Oleg TIMOKHOVICH
11
12
29
31
4
Olga VOROBEYCHIKOVA
Anna GULEVICH
Alexandra NIKITINA
Elena KHONICHEVA
13
11
32
28
5
Oleg OSAULENKO
Michael ROZENBLUM
Alexey KONDRASHENKO
Alexander RISKIN
18
10
38
22
6
Eugene RUDAKOV
Maxim KVEN
Yury VINOGRADOV
Anatoly PAVLOV
26
0
56
0
7
Alexey OTCHERTSOV
Boris SAZONOV
Eugene NOTKIN
Michael SHADRIN
0
43
0
60
8
Igor ARTAMONOV
Konstantin PERFILOV
Natalia ZHENOVA
Tatiana PEREKATOVA
19
12
37
23
9
Maxim ZHMAK
Oleg KAZANTSEV
Vladimir REKUNOV
Dmitry ROGOV
9
3
36
24
10
Sergey KOZLOV
Alexander PETRUNIN
Arkady BELINKOV
Eugene MARCHENKO
3
21
12
48
11
Michael BAKAL
Michael KRASNOSELSKY
Larisa PANINA
Dmitry PROKHOROV
4
19
15
45
12
Maxim SALMIN
Gombo TSYDYNZHAPOV
Alexey KOSHELEV
Konstantin PEREKHREST
6
11
25
35
13
Anatoly GUDKOV
Alexander ISAEV
Svetlana CHUBAROVA
Anatoly RADOKHLEB
15
16
29
31
14
Pavel GOMEROV
Andrey SHUDNEV
Leonid BIZER
Lev BRUNI
3
9
24
36
15
Alexey BOGACH
Michael LITMAN
Maria LEBEDEVA
Igor KHAZANOV
10
19
21
39
16
Larisa KURSAKOVA
Anastasia MITYAGINA
Olga GALAKTIONOVA
Sergey STOLBOVSKY
20
30
20
40
DLR: N
VUL: EW
AQJ863
6
Q4
A864
K109
105
754
AQ532
K1094
J
A875
QJ73
K5
2
J87
K109632
1092
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
5
6
3
8
5
E
7
6
9
4
5
S
5
6
3
8
5
W
7
7
9
4
7
minimax = 3
W, -140
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
2
N
K
-1
-50 
2
-2
2
14
20
2
N
K
-2
-100 
0
0
3
4
22
4
W
A
-1
    100
5
-5
4
7
3
4
W
Q
=
-620 
-11
11
5
16
26
3
W
Q
+1
-170 
-2
2
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
3
E
Q
+1
-170 
-2
2
8
30
29
4
S
K
-2
-100 
0
0
9
9
13
2
N
K
-1
-50 
2
-2
10
11
27
4
E
A
=
-620 
-11
11
11
23
6
3
W
A
=
-140 
-1
1
12
32
15
2
N
10
-2
-100 
0
0
13
17
5
2
N
10
+2
    170
7
-7
14
8
28
3
W
A
=
-140 
-1
1
15
31
1
4
W
Q
=
-620 
-11
11
16
25
19
4
W
Q
-1
    100
5
-5
DLR: E
VUL: Both
AK854
KQ4
J
J1083
J2
106
Q96
106
A532
KQ109742
65
K9
Q542
1073
J987
A83
A76
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
7
10
9
5
9
E
4
3
4
8
4
S
7
10
9
5
9
W
4
3
4
8
4
minimax = 4
N, +620
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
4
N
2
=
    620
5
-5
2
14
20
4
N
6
=
    620
5
-5
3
4
22
4
N
5
=
    620
5
-5
4
7
3
4
N
6
=
    620
5
-5
5
16
26
3
S
K
=
    140
-7
7
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
3NT
N
K
-5
-500 
-14
14
8
30
29
3NT
S
K
-3
-300 
-12
12
9
9
13
4
N
6
=
    620
5
-5
10
11
27
3
W
2
-1
    100
-7
7
11
23
6
2
N
A
+1
    140
-7
7
12
32
15
4
N
6
=
    620
5
-5
13
17
5
3
N
7
+1
    170
-6
6
14
8
28
3
N
4
=
    140
-7
7
15
31
1
4
N
5
=
    620
5
-5
16
25
19
4
N
6
=
    620
5
-5
DLR: S
VUL: None
105
A754
KJ1042
K8
K
107
AQ987642
J96
10
AQ85
3
J10754
AQ9
J3
KQ832
976
632
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
0
0
7
7
0
E
8
12
5
6
11
S
0
0
7
7
0
W
8
12
5
6
11
minimax = 6
E, -980
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
2
14
20
5
x
S
K
-4
-800 
-7
7
3
4
22
6
W
5
=
-980 
-10
10
4
7
3
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
5
16
26
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
6
2
21
2
W
10
-2
    100
12
-12
7
10
18
6
x
E
3
=
-1210 
-12
12
8
30
29
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
9
9
13
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
10
11
27
4
E
2
+3
-510 
0
0
11
23
6
4
E
A
+2
-480 
1
-1
12
32
15
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
13
17
5
6
E
7
=
-980 
-10
10
14
8
28
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
15
31
1
4
E
K
+2
-480 
1
-1
16
25
19
5
xx
E
K
+1
-1200 
-12
12
DLR: W
VUL: NS
109643
852
AQ10
Q6
--
108
AK82
AKJ1094
6
32
K9854
K10542
A98
QJ75
Q73
J76
J73
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
2
5
1
2
1
E
11
8
12
11
11
S
2
5
1
2
1
W
11
8
12
11
11
minimax = 6
W, -980
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
4
W
10
+2
-480 
-1
1
2
14
20
6
W
A
-1
      50
11
-11
3
4
22
3NT
E
Q
+2
-460 
0
0
4
7
3
3NT
E
5
=
-400 
2
-2
5
16
26
4
W
5
+2
-480 
-1
1
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
A-/A-
-2
-2
8
30
29
6
W
A
-1
      50
11
-11
9
9
13
3NT
E
Q
+3
-490 
-1
1
10
11
27
3NT
E
2
=
-400 
2
-2
11
23
6
5
W
A
=
-400 
2
-2
12
32
15
6
W
10
=
-920 
-10
10
13
17
5
3NT
W
4
+2
-460 
0
0
14
8
28
3NT
E
Q
+3
-490 
-1
1
15
31
1
5
W
A
=
-400 
2
-2
16
25
19
6
W
10
=
-920 
-10
10
DLR: N
VUL: Both
QJ10
KQJ874
KQ84
--
K92
109
A654
A6
105
109752
J63
J43
KQ82
873
932
A
A109765
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
8
7
10
6
7
E
4
6
3
6
6
S
8
7
10
6
7
W
4
6
3
6
6
minimax = 4
N, +620
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
4
N
K
=
    620
0
0
2
14
20
4
N
K
=
    620
0
0
3
4
22
4
N
K
=
    620
0
0
4
7
3
4
N
Q
=
    620
0
0
5
16
26
4
N
K
=
    620
0
0
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
4
N
5
=
    620
0
0
8
30
29
4
N
5
=
    620
0
0
9
9
13
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
10
11
27
4
N
2
+1
    650
1
-1
11
23
6
4
N
A
=
    620
0
0
12
32
15
4
N
K
=
    620
0
0
13
17
5
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
14
8
28
4
N
2
=
    620
0
0
15
31
1
4
N
K
+1
    650
1
-1
16
25
19
4
N
10
=
    620
0
0
DLR: E
VUL: None
Q6432
AQJ2
A95
4
A5
110
1097
K84
107
Q86
KJ42
AKQJ7
10932
KJ8
9653
1073
865
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
4
9
8
4
3
E
6
4
3
8
9
S
4
9
8
4
3
W
6
4
5
9
9
minimax = 4
* W, +100
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
2NT
W
2
=
-120 
-1
1
2
14
20
5
W
3
-1
      50
4
-4
3
4
22
1NT
W
Q
+2
-150 
-2
2
4
7
3
4
W
3
-1
      50
4
-4
5
16
26
3
N
9
+1
    170
6
-6
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
3NT x
E
5
=
-550 
-10
10
8
30
29
3
S
A
+1
    170
6
-6
9
9
13
1NT
W
3
+2
-150 
-2
2
10
11
27
1NT
W
2
+3
-180 
-3
3
11
23
6
4
W
A
=
-130 
-1
1
12
32
15
3
W
3
+1
-130 
-1
1
13
17
5
3
N
7
+1
    170
6
-6
14
8
28
3
N
9
-1
-50 
1
-1
15
31
1
3NT
W
Q
=
-400 
-7
7
16
25
19
3NT
W
3
+1
-430 
-8
8
DLR: S
VUL: NS
5
Q843
A74
Q9654
Q
111
AKJ10732
AJ95
1072
KQ93
6
A872
J10
9864
K6
J10852
K3
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
2
2
5
7
6
E
10
10
8
5
7
S
3
2
5
7
6
W
10
10
8
5
7
minimax = 3NT E, -430
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
4
E
K
+1
-450 
0
0
2
14
20
4
E
J
+1
-450 
0
0
3
4
22
4
E
J
+1
-450 
0
0
4
7
3
4
E
K
+1
-450 
0
0
5
16
26
6
W
5
-1
      50
10
-10
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
3NT x
E
3
+1
-650 
-5
5
8
30
29
4
E
K
=
-420 
1
-1
9
9
13
4
E
2
+1
-450 
0
0
10
11
27
4
E
2
+1
-450 
0
0
11
23
6
4
E
A
=
-420 
1
-1
12
32
15
4
E
3
+1
-450 
0
0
13
17
5
4
E
5
=
-420 
1
-1
14
8
28
4
E
K
=
-420 
1
-1
15
31
1
4
E
5
+2
-480 
-1
1
16
25
19
6NT
E
3
-1
      50
10
-10
DLR: W
VUL: EW
QJ76432
A9
63
J10
105
112
8
KJ4
1073
QJ84
AK10952
K952
Q76
AK9
Q8652
7
A843
Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
 
NT
 
 
NT
N
7
10
7
3
5
E
4
2
5
10
8
S
7
10
7
3
5
W
4
2
5
10
8
minimax = 5
* E, +200
TBL
NS
EW
CONT
BY
LEAD
TR
SCORE
NS
EW
1
24
12
4
N
A
+1
    450
1
-1
2
14
20
4
N
A
+1
    450
1
-1
3
4
22
4
S
Q
+1
    450
1
-1
4
7
3
4
N
K
+1
    450
1
-1
5
16
26
4
S
Q
+1
    450
1
-1
6
2
21
A+/A-
2
-3
7
10
18
4
N
A
=
    420
0
0
8
30
29
4
N
K
=
    420
0
0
9
9
13
4
N
A
=
    420
0
0
10
11
27
4
N
2
=
    420
0
0
11
23
6
5
N
A
-1
-50 
-10
10
12
32
15
4
N
A
=
    420
0
0
13
17
5
4
N
A
=
    420
0
0
14
8
28
4
N
A
=
    420
0
0
15
31
1
4
N
A
+1
    450
1
-1
16
25
19
4
S
A
=
    420
0
0
Scoring and results by Anton Osipov© 2010 for SLAVA CUP.