SLAVA CUP - 2010 TOP 32

Moscow City Golf Club, February 20 - 22, 2010

Results of round 5.

Table	NS		EW		IMPs		VPs		adj
Table	NS		EW		NS	EW	NS	EW	NS	EW
1	Sergey ERSHOV Gennady RYBNIKOV		Igor RADYUKEVICH Oleg TIMOKHOVICH		32	8	52	4
2	Ivan SEMENOV Vitold SLIVA		Eugene NOTKIN Michael SHADRIN		30	4	56	4
3	Yury ANDREEV Pavel VOROBEY		Yury VINOGRADOV Anatoly PAVLOV		18	24	24	36
4	Sergey KOZLOV Alexander PETRUNIN		Alexey BOGACH Michael LITMAN		19	10	39	21
5	Arkady BELINKOV Eugene MARCHENKO		Maxim SALMIN Gombo TSYDYNZHAPOV		5	16	19	41
6	Michael BAKAL Michael KRASNOSELSKY		Alexey KONDRASHENKO Alexander RISKIN		11	41	0	60
7	Dmitry VOLKOV Sergey POROSHIN		Olga VOROBEYCHIKOVA Anna GULEVICH		17	18	29	31	-2	-2
8	Maxim ZHMAK Oleg KAZANTSEV		Larisa PANINA Dmitry PROKHOROV		19	24	25	35
9	Oleg OSAULENKO Michael ROZENBLUM		Larisa KURSAKOVA Anastasia MITYAGINA		42	7	60	0
10	Igor ARTAMONOV Konstantin PERFILOV		Vladimir REKUNOV Dmitry ROGOV		14	30	14	46
11	Alexey OTCHERTSOV Boris SAZONOV		Alexey KOSHELEV Konstantin PEREKHREST		13	25	18	42	-1
12	Pavel GOMEROV Andrey SHUDNEV		Anatoly GUDKOV Alexander ISAEV		0	45	0	60	-1	-1
13	Eugene RUDAKOV Maxim KVEN		Natalia ZHENOVA Tatiana PEREKATOVA		31	19	42	18
14	Svetlana CHUBAROVA Anatoly RADOKHLEB		Alexandra NIKITINA Elena KHONICHEVA		19	23	26	34
15	Olga GALAKTIONOVA Sergey STOLBOVSKY		Valentin KYCHANOV Sergey ORLOV		22	17	35	25
16	Maria LEBEDEVA Igor KHAZANOV		Leonid BIZER Lev BRUNI		23	25	28	32

DLR: N		VUL: None
	K102
	A1062
	3
	Q6543
AJ7	33	9643
8		J7543
AQJ9754		--
K8		AJ109
	Q85
	KQ9
	K10862
	72

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	6	5	6	5	6		E	6	7	7	8	6
S	6	5	6	5	6		W	6	7	7	8	6
minimax = 1 W, -90

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	2	W	5	=	-90	-2	2
2	20	18	2	W	4	=	-90	-2	2
3	4	21	2	W	3	=	-110	-2	2
4	11	31	2	W	2	=	-90	-2	2
5	27	32	3	W	3	-1	50	3	-3
6	23	26	2x	E	8	+1	-570	-11	11
7	24	7	2	W	4	=	-90	-2	2
8	9	6	3	W	3	-1	50	3	-3
9	16	25	2x	E	K	-1	100	4	-4
10	30	13	3	W	3	-1	50	3	-3
11	10	15	3NT x	W	4	-3	500	11	-11
12	8	17	2x	N	6	-2	-300	-6	6
13	2	29	3	W	2	-2	100	4	-4
14	5	3	2x	W	2	+1	-280	-6	6
15	19	14	3NT	W	4	-3	150	5	-5
16	1	28	2	W	3	=	-90	-2	2

DLR: E		VUL: NS
	A1074
	--
	KQJ108
	AJ95
96532	34	KQJ8
954		K8
65		A93
KQ7		10843
	--
	AQJ107632
	742
	62

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	7	6	10	9	7		E	6	7	2	3	5
S	6	6	10	9	7		W	6	7	2	2	5
*minimax = 4 W, +500**

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
2	20	18	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
3	4	21	3	S	K	+2	200	-10	10
4	11	31	4	S	2	+1	650	0	0
5	27	32	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
6	23	26	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
7	24	7	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
8	9	6	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
9	16	25	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
10	30	13	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
11	10	15	4	S	6	+1	650	0	0
12	8	17	2	N	3	+2	130	-11	11
13	2	29	4	S	K	+1	650	0	0
14	5	3	4	S	2	+1	650	0	0
15	19	14	5x	S	K	=	850	5	-5
16	1	28	3	S	K	+2	200	-10	10

DLR: S		VUL: EW
	AQ872
	K32
	2
	AJ107
J1054	35	63
AQ8		J1074
AJ3		10765
952		Q43
	K9
	965
	KQ984
	K86

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	9	9	8	9	10		E	4	3	5	4	2
S	9	9	8	9	10		W	4	3	5	4	2
minimax = 3NT N, +400

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	3NT	S	5	=	400	5	-5
2	20	18	1NT	S	2	+3	180	-1	1
3	4	21	2	N	J	=	110	-3	3
4	11	31	1NT	S	2	+3	180	-1	1
5	27	32	3	N	3	+1	170	-2	2
6	23	26	2	N	J	=	110	-3	3
7	24	7	1NT	S	J	+3	180	-1	1
8	9	6	3NT	S	5	=	400	5	-5
9	16	25	1x	W	2	-3	800	11	-11
10	30	13	2	N	Q	+1	140	-2	2
11	10	15	2	N	J	+1	140	-2	2
12	8	17	4x	N	J	-1	-100	-8	8
13	2	29	3	S	2	+2	150	-2	2
14	5	3	3NT	S	2	+2	460	6	-6
15	19	14	3NT	N	J	+2	460	6	-6
16	1	28	1x	E	K	-3	800	11	-11

DLR: W		VUL: Both
	K7
	A95
	QJ7
	QJ1092
83	36	AJ
8743		KJ
K93		1086542
K853		A74
	Q1096542
	Q1062
	A
	6

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	6	10	8	5	7		E	5	3	4	8	6
S	6	10	8	5	7		W	5	3	4	8	6
minimax = 4 S, +620

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	4	S	K	+1	650	2	-2
2	20	18	4	S	3	=	620	2	-2
3	4	21	4	S	K	+1	650	2	-2
4	11	31	4	S	2	=	620	2	-2
5	27	32	4	S	K	+1	650	2	-2
6	23	26	4	S	3	-1	-100	-12	12
7	24	7	4	S	3	=	620	2	-2
8	9	6	2	S	3	+2	170	-9	9
9	16	25	4	S	7	=	620	2	-2
10	30	13	3	S	7	+1	170	-9	9
11	10	15	4	N	2	=	620	2	-2
12	8	17	4	N	6	-1	-100	-12	12
13	2	29	4	S	3	-1	-100	-12	12
14	5	3	4	S	2	=	620	2	-2
15	19	14	4	S	3	+1	650	2	-2
16	1	28	4	S	K	+1	650	2	-2

DLR: N		VUL: NS
	984
	K
	J93
	KQ10983
QJ6532	37	10
Q86		954
K		Q107642
A74		J65
	AK7
	AJ10732
	A85
	2

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	8	8	8	8	10		E	4	4	4	5	2
S	8	8	8	8	10		W	4	4	4	5	2
minimax = 1 N, +130

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	3NT	S	5	=	600	10	-10
2	20	18	3NT	S	2	=	600	10	-10
3	4	21	3NT	N	Q	=	600	10	-10
4	11	31	4	S	K	-2	-200	-7	7
5	27	32	4	S	Q	-2	-200	-7	7
6	23	26	4	S	Q	+1	650	11	-11
7	24	7	3NT	S	6	-3	-300	-9	9
8	9	6	4	S	Q	-2	-200	-7	7
9	16	25	3NT	S	5	=	600	10	-10
10	30	13	4	S	K	=	620	11	-11
11	10	15	4	S	4	-2	-200	-7	7
12	8	17	4	N	3	-2	-200	-7	7
13	2	29	4	S	2	-1	-100	-5	5
14	5	3	3	N	2	-2	-200	-7	7
15	19	14	4	S	Q	-3	-300	-9	9
16	1	28	3NT	S	5	=	600	10	-10

DLR: E		VUL: EW
	QJ102
	5
	1096
	87543
K653	38	7
AJ43		K109876
AK873		Q42
--		A92
	A984
	Q2
	J5
	KQJ106

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	1	6	0	1	6		E	12	7	12	12	5
S	1	6	0	1	6		W	12	7	12	12	5
minimax = 6NT W, -1440

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	6	W	7	+1	-1460	-6	6
2	20	18	5x	S	A	-3	-500	12	-12
3	4	21	6	W	7	+1	-1460	-6	6
4	11	31	4	E	K	+3	-710	11	-11
5	27	32	6	E	K	+1	-1460	-6	6
6	23	26	6	E	A	=	-1430	-5	5
7	24	7	6	E	K	+1	-1460	-6	6
8	9	6	4	E	Q	+2	-680	11	-11
9	16	25	6	W	8	+1	-1460	-6	6
10	30	13	6	W	7	=	-1430	-5	5
11	10	15	6	E	K	+1	-1460	-6	6
12	8	17					A-/A-	-2	-2
13	2	29	5	E	K	+2	-710	11	-11
14	5	3	4	W	2	+2	-680	11	-11
15	19	14	7x	S	A	-5	-1100	4	-4
16	1	28	6	W	7	=	-1430	-5	5

DLR: S		VUL: Both
	A
	A64
	A953
	KQJ95
QJ87543	39	K1062
K92		QJ1073
QJ2		K764
--		--
	9
	85
	108
	A10876432

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	11	3	3	7	11		E	2	10	9	6	2
S	11	3	3	7	11		W	2	10	9	6	2
*minimax = 6 W, +500**

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22	6	N	Q	+1	1390	15	-15
2	20	18	6x	W	A	-2	500	6	-6
3	4	21	6x	W	A	-2	500	6	-6
4	11	31	6x	W	A	-2	500	6	-6
5	27	32	5x	W	K	-1	200	-1	1
6	23	26	6x	S	Q	-1	-200	-10	10
7	24	7	6	N	2	=	1370	15	-15
8	9	6	6	S	Q	-1	-100	-8	8
9	16	25	6	N	2	=	1370	15	-15
10	30	13	4	S	2	-8	-800	-14	14
11	10	15	7	S	3	-2	-200	-10	10
12	8	17	5x	E	A	-1	200	-1	1
13	2	29	6x	S	Q	=	1540	16	-16
14	5	3	7	S	2	-2	-200	-10	10
15	19	14	5x	W	Q	-1	200	-1	1
16	1	28	6	S	Q	-1	-100	-8	8

DLR: W		VUL: None
	964
	QJ6
	K
	QJ9764
10832	40	AKJ
1092		43
Q83		J109754
K108		A3
	Q75
	AK875
	A62
	52

Makeable tricks for each denomination and each hand under assumption of optimal play and defense:
	NT							NT
N	7	7	9	5	9		E	5	6	4	8	4
S	7	7	9	5	9		W	5	6	4	8	4
minimax = 3 S, +140

TBL	NS	EW	CONT	BY	LEAD	TR	SCORE	NS	EW
1	12	22					A-/A-	-2	-2
2	20	18	2	S	3	=	110	-1	1
3	4	21	3	E	K	-1	50	-3	3
4	11	31	3	S	2	=	140	0	0
5	27	32	2	N	3	+1	140	0	0
6	23	26	2	S	3	+1	140	0	0
7	24	7	3	S	3	=	140	0	0
8	9	6	3	S	3	=	140	0	0
9	16	25	2	S	3	=	110	-1	1
10	30	13	2	S	3	+1	140	0	0
11	10	15	3	S	4	=	140	0	0
12	8	17	2	N	2	+1	140	0	0
13	2	29	2	S	3	+1	140	0	0
14	5	3	2	S	2	+1	140	0	0
15	19	14	4	E	5	=	-130	-7	7
16	1	28	2	S	5	+1	140	0	0

Scoring and results by Anton Osipov© 2010 for SLAVA CUP.